Standard Language Variation in Chinese
Some Insights from Both Theory and Practice
In the discourse on pluricentricity, standard language variation within the Chinese language has rarely been addressed, even though it is the most widely spoken language in the world and steadily gains in popularity amongst foreign language learners. Chinese exhibits a multitude of (potential) standard varieties, yet it is a prime example of an Einbau language—a language that strives for homogeneity—, which makes research on standard language variation highly challenging and explains the lack of scientific interest until now. This paper proposes a holistic approach to Chinese standard language variation by not only scrutinizing Mandarin but also Cantonese and Hokkien. In a next step, two studies provide a glimpse into the perception of Mandarin pluricentricity in practice. The data reveal that the Mandarin learners who participated in an online questionnaire were more open to the idea of a pluricentric Chinese language than the four Mandarin teachers who were interviewed. Lastly, this paper goes into the reasons for the troublesome process of collecting data on Chinese pluricentricity but also why it is a fruitful endeavor that we need to undertake in order to improve our understanding of Chinese.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).